The proprietary Ain’t Think or Thoughtless protocol was created by 1518 & projects to:
- Protect mental privacy and cognitive liberty: Safeguard individuals’ control over their own minds and the information within them.
- Prevent the indiscriminate leakage of brain data: Mitigate the uncontrolled spread of sensitive neural information.
- Prohibit unauthorized mind reading: Ensure that access to an individual’s thoughts requires their explicit consent.
- Uphold the right to bodily autonomy: Empower individuals to control the use of their own brains and neurotechnology.
- Affirm the right to refuse coercive neurotechnology: Ensure that individuals cannot be compelled to use or participate in neurotechnologies against their will.
- Reaffirm fundamental human rights: Uphold the inalienable rights of freedom of thought and conscience.
- Detect and prevent unlawful interception: Identify and thwart illegal access to neural data.
- Prevent thought policing: Safeguard individuals from any attempt to control or manipulate their thoughts or beliefs.
- Reafirm the right against self-incrimination is a fundamental legal principle that protects individuals from being compelled to provide information or testimony that could incriminate them in a criminal case.
Mind reading and mind hacking:
- Violates Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
- Violates the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
- Violates the Right to Freedom of Thought (Article 9 ECHR).
- Violates the European Convention on Human Rights.
- The interception of any wire, oral, written, visual, thought-to-speech, text communication, or electronic communication without prior consent is unlawful.
- Violates the 5th Amendment’s right against self-incrimination.
Mental decoders, brain printers, thought-to-text converters, thought recordings, and reproduction devices:
- Infringe copyrights.
- Violate the right to mental privacy.
- Violate private property rights.
- Violate intellectual property rights.
absolute rights include freedom of thought, conscience, and religion and the prohibitions on torture, inhuman treatment or punishment, and degrading treatment or punishment. Absolute rights cannot be limited for any reason. No circumstance justifies a qualification or limitation of absolute rights. Absolute rights cannot be stopped or restricted, even during a declared state of emergency
Mind-reading technologies – the ability to decipher human thoughts, emotions, and intentions – are emerging from ongoing research in neuroscience and psychology. While promising potential benefits exist, these technologies raise profound ethical concerns.
A primary concern is the invasion of privacy. Access to an individual’s innermost thoughts and feelings is a fundamental right. The potential for misuse, such as unauthorized data collection and exploitation, poses significant risks.
Furthermore, obtaining true informed consent for mind-reading technologies presents a major challenge. The current understanding of these technologies is limited, making it difficult to fully explain the potential risks and benefits to individuals.
The use of mind-reading evidence in legal proceedings raises serious questions about due process and the right to a fair trial. Thoughts are subjective and can be easily misinterpreted or manipulated, potentially leading to unjust outcomes.
The responsible development and deployment of mind-reading technologies require careful consideration of ethical guidelines. These guidelines must address critical issues such as privacy protection, informed consent, potential for misuse, the risk of mass surveillance, social stigma, and the preservation of individual autonomy.”
idiocrination is not indoctrinationain’t think – project stamps 2017-2025
- ai content generator
- legal advice & project stamps 2017-2025
- Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology – Roberto Andorno & Marcello Lenca 2017
- ain’t think thibia
- is not – 1518&projects continued since 9 september 2018
- do not follow my thoughts, follow air-cavitas-oris
- $ chmod 700 mymind.must, 1518&projects, 50, 8, 99%, absolute right, AI, ain't - think - phibia, ain't think, ain't think - najw, ain’t think – project stamps 2017-2020, air cavitas oris, Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, brain - unwired, cannot speak for S-2 & S-3, cavitas-oris, class-action lawsuit, copyright infringement, DDO&V, deactivate - Infectious invalidity, deactivate - magnetic resonance imaging, deactivate - mental decoders and brain printers, deactivate - mind reading & mind hacking, deactivate - share your thoughts, deactivate - thought theft, deactivate - thought to recorder, deactivate - transcranial direct current stimulation, deactivate thought-to-text converters, denial of reason to give away your skull-bone, do not distort, do not do odwrotkas, do not follow my thoughts - follow cavitas oris, don't do odwrotkas, don't think, ethical and legal implications, ethics, fiche, first published - 24 november 2017, fists or justice, fiszka, human right law, important social value, International Court of Justice, international law, it's illegal to translate my thoughts, jurisprudence of the mind, just ain't think, law, legal inventions, mind hacking is a crime, mind reading & mind hacking, moral law, My body parts- NFS MNA NFR, My Brain & my Thoughts - NFS MNA NFR, My internal organs - NFS MNA NFR, my mind is my own, MY-IT, nelson hold, Neurolaw, never mind, new laws to prevent mind-hacking, o-n, o-werki, ONST, pervasive computing, pre-crime division, prevents someone from having mind read without consent, private property rights, project stamps, project's innovations, Property law, proprietary protocol, protect against mind hacking, queen, reducing its surface of vulnerability, Roberto Andorno & Marcello Ienca 2017, S-1, science, security society, state prince, stop brainjacking, stop mind hacking, sudo disable thought-to-speech, system, t-werki, technical safeguard protects brain data, the 5th Amendment’sright to not self incriminate, The Data Protection Act, Thou canst not touch the freedom of my mind, thought recording and reproduction device, thoughtless, to understand, tribal, truth, u-werki, violates European Convention on Human Rights, violates intellectual property law, violates privacy laws, violates private property rights, voluntary participation, WzS, znaczeniowa, znaczeniowka
